FCTE vs IVV
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FCTE or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCTE | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $240M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 21 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.74% | +13.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.42% | +21.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $11,681 | $14,516Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 51.6% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | 3FourteenSMI | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 2, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2024 to Sep 3, 2026 (2.2 years).
FCTE vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
FCTE vs IVV Performance
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) is an ETF from 3FourteenSMI and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FCTE returned +10.42% while IVV returned +21.57%. Year to date, FCTE is up 13.74% versus a gain of 13.86% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCTE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for FCTE and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCTE charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCTE currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of FCTE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.8% of IVV's money is in holdings FCTE also owns.
Most of FCTE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in FCTE and 505 in IVV, against full books of 21 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 20 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 477 positions FCTE does not, 86.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%, AVGO 2.98%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FCTE | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.96% | 5.44% | 0.48% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 4.89% | 1.94% | 2.95% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.93% | 1.39% | 3.54% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 5.62% | 0.58% | 5.04% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.89% | 0.93% | 3.96% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 5.03% | 0.64% | 4.39% |
| JBLJabil, Inc. | 5.61% | 0.05% | 5.56% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 5.34% | 0.31% | 5.03% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 5.06% | 0.32% | 4.74% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 4.88% | 0.38% | 4.50% |
100.0% of FCTE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FCTE or IVV?
Over the past year FCTE returned +10.42% vs +21.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FCTE annualized +7.32% vs +18.46% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FCTE -19.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both FCTE and IVV?
FCTE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FCTE and IVV?
100.0% of FCTE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.8% of IVV's is in holdings FCTE also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in FCTE and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FCTE?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.