FCTE vs IVV
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FCTE | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $246M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 21 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +20.45% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.37% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | 3FourteenSMI | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 2, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
FCTE vs IVV Performance
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE) is a ETF from 3FourteenSMI and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FCTE returned +16.37% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FCTE is up 20.45% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FCTE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for FCTE and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FCTE charges 0.85% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FCTE currently yields 0.08% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FCTE and IVV share 20 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE has an expense ratio of 0.85% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FCTE or IVV?
Over the past year FCTE returned +16.37% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FCTE annualized +10.47% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FCTE -19.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FCTE and IVV?
FCTE and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FCTE and IVV?
FCTE and IVV share 20 common holdings with a 8.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FCTE or IVV?
FCTE yields 0.08% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.