FDRR vs VOO
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FDRR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FDRR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $709M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.16% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 124 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.12% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.78% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.50% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.92% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FDRR vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates (FDRR) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FDRR returned +25.78% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, FDRR is up 15.12% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, FDRR compounded at +21.50% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.92% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +12.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FDRR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.6% for FDRR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FDRR charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FDRR currently yields 2.16% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FDRR and VOO share 88 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FDRR or VOO?
FDRR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FDRR or VOO?
Over the past year FDRR returned +25.78% vs +21.63% for VOO, so FDRR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FDRR annualized +12.43% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FDRR or VOO?
FDRR has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FDRR -37.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FDRR and VOO?
FDRR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FDRR and VOO?
FDRR and VOO share 88 common holdings with a 47.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FDRR or VOO?
FDRR yields 2.16% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FDRR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.