FNCL vs IVV
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FNCL or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNCL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 389 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.86% | +11.03%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.99% | +15.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.61% | +20.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.15% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -45.0% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,215 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.4% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2013 to Sep 16, 2026 (12.9 years).
FNCL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
FNCL vs IVV Performance
Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FNCL returned +5.99% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, FNCL is up 2.86% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, FNCL compounded at +19.61% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +10.15% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.65% annualized vs +10.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -45.0% for FNCL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNCL charges 0.08% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNCL currently yields 1.53% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
84.3% of FNCL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.0% of IVV's money is in holdings FNCL also owns.
Most of FNCL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
72 positions in common, counted across the 369 positions we hold weights for in FNCL and 490 in IVV, against full books of 389 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 409 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FNCL (86.7% of the fund), and 276 for FNCL that do not appear in IVV (13.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNCL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 10.43% | 1.44% | 8.99% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 7.84% | 1.39% | 6.45% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 6.94% | 0.95% | 5.99% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 5.27% | 0.72% | 4.55% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 4.43% | 0.61% | 3.82% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 3.34% | 0.46% | 2.88% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 2.88% | 0.40% | 2.48% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 2.77% | 0.39% | 2.38% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 2.48% | 0.34% | 2.14% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 2.00% | 0.27% | 1.73% |
84.3% of FNCL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNCL or IVV?
FNCL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNCL or IVV?
Over the past year FNCL returned +5.99% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FNCL annualized +10.29% vs +12.65% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNCL or IVV?
FNCL has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FNCL -45.0% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both FNCL and IVV?
FNCL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNCL and IVV?
84.3% of FNCL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.0% of IVV's is in holdings FNCL also owns. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 369 positions we hold weights for in FNCL and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNCL or IVV?
FNCL yields 1.53% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FNCL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FNCL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.