FNGG vs SPGM
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. FNGG delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGG | SPGM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $143M | $1.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 10.70% | 1.81% | |
| Holdings | 18 | 2,985 | |
| YTD Return | +29.44% | +14.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.54% | +25.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +60.38% | +22.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.76% | +11.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 58.4% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -91.3% | -34.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 29, 2021 | Feb 27, 2012 |
FNGG vs SPGM Performance
Direxion Daily NYSE FANG+ Bull 2X ETF (FNGG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% while SPGM returned +25.63%. Year to date, FNGG is up 29.44% versus a gain of 14.45% for SPGM.
Over three years, FNGG compounded at +60.38% per year against +22.00% for SPGM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.76% and +11.59% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, SPGM has the edge at +9.87% annualized vs +3.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 58.4% compared with 13.6% for SPGM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -91.3% for FNGG and -34.0% for SPGM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGG charges 0.97% per year while SPGM charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $9 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGG currently yields 10.70% against 1.81% for SPGM.
Holdings Overlap
FNGG and SPGM share 9 holdings out of 2850 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGG or SPGM?
FNGG has an expense ratio of 0.97% while SPGM charges 0.09%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNGG or SPGM?
Over the past year FNGG returned +35.54% vs +25.63% for SPGM, so FNGG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FNGG annualized +3.76% vs +9.87% for SPGM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNGG or SPGM?
FNGG has been the more volatile fund at 58.4% annualized versus 13.6% for SPGM. Worst drawdown: FNGG -91.3% vs SPGM -34.0%.
Should I hold both FNGG and SPGM?
FNGG and SPGM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGG and SPGM?
FNGG and SPGM share 9 common holdings with a 15.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2850 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGG or SPGM?
FNGG yields 10.70% while SPGM yields 1.81%, so FNGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.