FPAG vs VTI
FPA Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FPAG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $611M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 70 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.18% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.04% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.95% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | FPA Investors First | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FPAG vs VTI Performance
FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) is a ETF from FPA Investors First and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FPAG returned +21.04% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, FPAG is up 12.18% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, FPAG compounded at +21.95% per year against +21.85% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, FPAG has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FPAG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.4% for FPAG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FPAG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FPAG currently yields 1.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FPAG and VTI share 31 holdings out of 2820 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FPAG or VTI?
FPAG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FPAG or VTI?
Over the past year FPAG returned +21.04% vs +21.12% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FPAG annualized +13.35% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FPAG or VTI?
FPAG has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FPAG -28.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FPAG and VTI?
FPAG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FPAG and VTI?
FPAG and VTI share 31 common holdings with a 12.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2820 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FPAG or VTI?
FPAG yields 1.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FPAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.