GARA vs VOO

GARA vs VOO

Which is better, GARA or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GARA is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: GARA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGARAVOO
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$406,520.41$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.57%1.04%
Holdings40509
YTD Return+3.03%+13.82%Best
1Y Return-+18.56%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.49%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Top 10 Weight32.7%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyGuinness Atkinson FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 22, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GARA vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GARA vs VOO Performance

Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GARA is up 3.03% versus a gain of 13.82% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GARA charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GARA currently yields 1.57% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

GARA already in VOO38.4%
VOO already in GARA1.6%

38.4% of GARA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.6% of VOO's money is in holdings GARA also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GARA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 40 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 474 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GARA (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for GARA that do not appear in VOO (2.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GARAWeight in VOODifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.3.57%0.26%3.31%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp3.32%0.27%3.05%
VTRVentas  Inc .3.49%0.07%3.42%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust3.31%0.16%3.15%
PLDPrologis Inc3.00%0.21%2.79%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.2.89%0.10%2.79%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation2.85%0.13%2.72%
DUKDuke Energy Corp2.80%0.15%2.65%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc2.71%0.11%2.60%
PEGPublic Svc Ent Group2.65%0.06%2.59%

38.4% of GARA is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GARAVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GARA or VOO?

GARA has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GARA and VOO?

38.4% of GARA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.6% of VOO's is in holdings GARA also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GARA and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, GARA or VOO?

GARA yields 1.57% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GARA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GARA?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GARA is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.