GARA vs IVV

GARA vs IVV

Which is better, GARA or IVV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. GARA is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: GARA

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGARAIVV
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$410,674.98$886.7B
Dividend Yield1.56%1.10%
Holdings40508
YTD Return+8.24%+13.39%Best
1Y Return-+20.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.29%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.88%
Top 10 Weight32.7%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyGuinness Atkinson FundsiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 22, 2025May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GARA vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GARA vs IVV Performance

Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) is an ETF from Guinness Atkinson Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GARA is up 8.24% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GARA charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GARA currently yields 1.56% against 1.10% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

GARA already in IVV38.3%
IVV already in GARA1.6%

38.3% of GARA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings GARA also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GARA and 504 in IVV, against full books of 40 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GARA (97.7% of the fund), and 1 for GARA that do not appear in IVV (2.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GARAWeight in IVVDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.3.44%0.25%3.19%
UNPUnion Pacific Corp3.34%0.26%3.08%
EQIXEquinix Inc - Common3.43%0.16%3.27%
VTRVentas, Inc.3.37%0.07%3.30%
PLDPrologis Inc3.00%0.20%2.80%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.2.99%0.10%2.89%
DUKDuke Energy Corp.2.81%0.14%2.67%
AMTAmerican Tower Corp2.77%0.12%2.65%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc2.71%0.10%2.61%
PEGPublic Service Enterprise Group Incorporated2.67%0.06%2.61%

38.3% of GARA is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GARAIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GARA or IVV?

GARA has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GARA and IVV?

38.3% of GARA's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.6% of IVV's is in holdings GARA also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in GARA and 504 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, GARA or IVV?

GARA yields 1.56% while IVV yields 1.10%, so GARA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than GARA?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. GARA is less concentrated, with 32.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.