GEEQ vs VOO

GEEQ vs VOO

Which is better, GEEQ or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GEEQ is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: GEEQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGEEQVOO
Expense Ratio0.35%0.03%Best
AUM$61M$1.0T
Dividend Yield0.80%1.06%
Holdings112506
YTD Return+0.66%+14.10%Best
1Y Return-+16.50%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.14%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.83%
Top 10 Weight11.8%Best37.9%
Fund FamilyGuggenheim InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 20, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GEEQ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GEEQ vs VOO Performance

Guggenheim Enhanced Equity Income ETF (GEEQ) is an ETF from Guggenheim Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GEEQ is up 0.66% versus a gain of 14.10% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GEEQ charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEEQ currently yields 0.80% against 1.06% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

GEEQ already in VOO97.9%
VOO already in GEEQ8.5%

97.9% of GEEQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 8.5% of VOO's money is in holdings GEEQ also owns.

Most of GEEQ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

101 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in GEEQ and 504 in VOO, against full books of 112 and 506.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 398 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GEEQ (91.2% of the fund), and 2 for GEEQ that do not appear in VOO (2.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GEEQWeight in VOODifference
CVXChevron Corp1.02%0.58%0.44%
VZVerizon Communic1.01%0.32%0.69%
PEPPepsico Inc.1.02%0.29%0.73%
TAT&T Inc.1.02%0.27%0.75%
PFEPfizer Inc1.01%0.25%0.76%
NEENextera Energy Inc1.00%0.26%0.74%
MOAltria Group Inc1.06%0.17%0.89%
PGRProgressive Corporation1.04%0.19%0.85%
CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.151.03%0.18%0.85%
CMEC M E Group Inc.1.04%0.16%0.88%

97.9% of GEEQ is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GEEQVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GEEQ or VOO?

GEEQ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GEEQ and VOO?

97.9% of GEEQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 8.5% of VOO's is in holdings GEEQ also owns. They hold 101 positions in common, counted across the 112 positions we hold weights for in GEEQ and 504 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, GEEQ or VOO?

GEEQ yields 0.80% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GEEQ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. GEEQ is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.