GGRW vs QBIG
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Invesco Top QQQ ETF
Which is better, GGRW or QBIG?
QBIG has been ahead.
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. QBIG led over 1Y and the full window. GGRW is less concentrated, with 50.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | QBIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $7M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 85 | 36 |
| YTD Return | +1.93% | +4.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.81% | +1.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.30% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.66% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9%Best | 23.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.5%Best | -30.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $11,546 | $12,910Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 50.0%Best | 100.0% |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Dec 4, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2024 to Nov 12, 2026 (1.9 years).
GGRW vs QBIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
GGRW vs QBIG Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Invesco Top QQQ ETF (QBIG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GGRW returned +0.81% while QBIG returned +1.14%. Year to date, GGRW is up 1.93% versus a gain of 4.27% for QBIG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QBIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 15.9% for GGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.5% for GGRW and -30.3% for QBIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while QBIG charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $29 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for QBIG.
Holdings Overlap
35.5% of GGRW's money is in holdings QBIG also owns. 30.3% of QBIG's money is in holdings GGRW also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 10 in QBIG, against full books of 85 and 36.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for QBIG that do not appear in our book for GGRW (58.6% of the fund), and 32 for GGRW that do not appear in QBIG (59.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
35.5% of GGRW is already inside QBIG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or QBIG?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while QBIG charges 0.29%. GGRW is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGRW or QBIG?
Over the past year GGRW returned +0.81% vs +1.14% for QBIG, so QBIG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GGRW annualized +7.86% vs +14.39% for QBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGRW or QBIG?
QBIG has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 15.9% for GGRW. Worst drawdown: GGRW -20.5% vs QBIG -30.3%.
Should I hold both GGRW and QBIG?
GGRW and QBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and QBIG?
35.5% of GGRW's money is in holdings QBIG also owns. 30.3% of QBIG's is in holdings GGRW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 10 in QBIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or QBIG?
GGRW yields 0.42% while QBIG yields 0.00%, so GGRW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QBIG better than GGRW?
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. QBIG led over 1Y and the full window. GGRW is less concentrated, with 50.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.