HAPI vs VOO
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HAPI or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. HAPI led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAPI | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $501M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.77% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 157 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.70% | +11.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.03% | +15.60%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.65% | +20.82%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $22,612Best | $21,606 |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 13, 2022 to Sep 16, 2026 (3.9 years).
HAPI vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
HAPI vs VOO Performance
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Large Cap ETF (HAPI) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HAPI returned +15.03% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, HAPI is up 10.70% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.
Over three years, HAPI compounded at +20.65% per year against +20.82% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, HAPI has the edge at +23.27% annualized vs +21.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 12.7% for HAPI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for HAPI and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAPI charges 0.35% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAPI currently yields 0.77% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
95.9% of HAPI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.4% of VOO's money is in holdings HAPI also owns.
Most of HAPI is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
136 positions in common, counted across the 156 positions we hold weights for in HAPI and 494 in VOO, against full books of 157 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 352 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for HAPI (45.7% of the fund), and 17 for HAPI that do not appear in VOO (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAPI | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.29% | 7.55% | 2.26% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.66% | 7.05% | 1.39% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.56% | 5.36% | 0.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.71% | 4.13% | 1.58% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.88% | 3.24% | 1.64% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.02% | 1.90% | 2.12% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.19% | 1.46% | 1.73% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.38% | 1.41% | 0.97% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 3.02% | 0.71% | 2.31% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 2.49% | 0.47% | 2.02% |
95.9% of HAPI is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAPI or VOO?
HAPI has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HAPI or VOO?
Over the past year HAPI returned +15.03% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), HAPI annualized +23.27% vs +21.84% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HAPI or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 12.7% for HAPI. Worst drawdown: HAPI -19.5% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both HAPI and VOO?
HAPI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HAPI and VOO?
95.9% of HAPI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 53.4% of VOO's is in holdings HAPI also owns. They hold 136 positions in common, counted across the 156 positions we hold weights for in HAPI and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAPI or VOO?
HAPI yields 0.77% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than HAPI?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. HAPI led over the full window, VOO over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.