HCMT vs IVV
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HCMT or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HCMT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $588M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.58% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 509 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.24% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.20% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.73% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.4% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.3% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $16,864 | $18,143Best |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 22, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.2 years).
HCMT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
HCMT vs IVV Performance
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced US ETF (HCMT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HCMT returned +15.20% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, HCMT is up 7.24% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, HCMT compounded at +18.73% per year against +21.27% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 12.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.3% for HCMT and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HCMT charges 1.18% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $118 vs $3 annually, a gap of $115 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HCMT currently yields 0.58% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 94.3% of IVV's money is in holdings HCMT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for HCMT, our book for it covers 88.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IVV is already inside HCMT. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
474 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in HCMT and 505 in IVV, against full books of 509 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HCMT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.18% | 7.98% | 1.80% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.47% | 6.86% | 1.39% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.41% | 5.44% | 1.03% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.27% | 4.01% | 0.74% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 2.67% | 3.19% | 0.52% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.38% | 2.98% | 0.60% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.13% | 2.56% | 0.43% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.21% | 1.51% | 0.30% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.15% | 1.45% | 0.30% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.11% | 1.36% | 0.25% |
94.3% of IVV is already inside HCMT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HCMT or IVV?
HCMT has an expense ratio of 1.18% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $115 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HCMT or IVV?
Over the past year HCMT returned +15.20% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HCMT or IVV?
HCMT has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 12.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HCMT -36.3% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both HCMT and IVV?
HCMT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HCMT and IVV?
At least 94.3% of IVV's money is in holdings HCMT also owns. Our book for HCMT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 474 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in HCMT and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HCMT or IVV?
HCMT yields 0.58% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HCMT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.