HEFT vs VOO

HEFT vs VOO

Which is better, HEFT or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHEFTVOO
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$81M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.02%1.04%
Holdings51509
YTD Return+3.76%+14.14%Best
1Y Return-+17.31%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.85%
Top 10 Weight43.5%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyHedgeye Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 20, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HEFT vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HEFT vs VOO Performance

Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) is an ETF from Hedgeye Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HEFT is up 3.76% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HEFT charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HEFT currently yields 0.02% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

HEFT already in VOO78.1%
VOO already in HEFT42.7%

78.1% of HEFT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.7% of VOO's money is in holdings HEFT also owns.

Most of HEFT is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

36 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in HEFT and 494 in VOO, against full books of 51 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 451 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for HEFT (56.5% of the fund), and 11 for HEFT that do not appear in VOO (17.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HEFTWeight in VOODifference
AAPLApple, Inc9.50%7.05%2.45%
NVDANvidia Corp6.67%7.55%0.88%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.09%5.36%2.27%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.18%4.13%0.05%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.99%3.24%0.25%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.3.15%1.41%1.74%
JPMJpmorgan Chase2.96%1.46%1.50%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc2.55%1.21%1.34%
VVisa Inc Class A2.49%0.93%1.56%
GEGeneral Electric Co.2.30%0.58%1.72%

78.1% of HEFT is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HEFTVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HEFT or VOO?

HEFT has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HEFT and VOO?

78.1% of HEFT's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.7% of VOO's is in holdings HEFT also owns. They hold 36 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in HEFT and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, HEFT or VOO?

HEFT yields 0.02% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than HEFT?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.