HRTS vs VYM
Tema Heart & Health ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, HRTS or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HRTS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.27% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 45 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.32% | +10.96%Best |
| 1Y Return | +21.31%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 10.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.7% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $14,259 | $16,165Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.9% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 21, 2023 to Sep 22, 2026 (2.8 years).
HRTS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
HRTS vs VYM Performance
Tema Heart & Health ETF (HRTS) is an ETF from Tema Global Limited and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HRTS returned +21.31% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, HRTS is up 3.32% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HRTS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 10.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.7% for HRTS and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HRTS charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HRTS currently yields 1.27% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
27.5% of HRTS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.3% of VYM's money is in holdings HRTS also owns.
HRTS and VYM share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in HRTS and 557 in VYM, against full books of 45 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 519 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HRTS (86.8% of the fund), and 27 for HRTS that do not appear in VYM (54.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HRTS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 5.06% | 1.52% | 3.54% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 3.86% | 2.51% | 1.35% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.33% | 1.31% | 3.02% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 2.34% | 1.80% | 0.54% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.13% | 0.66% | 2.47% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 3.03% | 0.74% | 2.29% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.23% | 0.54% | 1.69% |
| MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.11% | 0.44% | 1.67% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 1.38% | 0.78% | 0.60% |
27.5% of HRTS is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HRTS or VYM?
HRTS has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HRTS or VYM?
Over the past year HRTS returned +21.31% vs +15.42% for VYM, so HRTS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HRTS or VYM?
HRTS has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 10.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HRTS -24.7% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both HRTS and VYM?
HRTS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HRTS and VYM?
27.5% of HRTS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.3% of VYM's is in holdings HRTS also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in HRTS and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, HRTS or VYM?
HRTS yields 1.27% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than HRTS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. HRTS led over 1Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.