HUSV vs USMC
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF vs Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
Which is better, HUSV or USMC?
Each has led over a different period.
USMC has a lower expense ratio. HUSV led over 1Y, USMC over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUSV | USMC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.12%Best |
| AUM | $56M | $4.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 203 | 213 |
| YTD Return | +11.98%Best | +11.54% |
| 1Y Return | +11.28%Best | +9.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.41% | +21.10%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.37% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.7% | -30.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,617 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.9%Best | 51.6% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Principal Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 24, 2016 | Oct 11, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2017 to Nov 11, 2026 (9.1 years).
HUSV vs USMC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.1 years both funds cover.
HUSV vs USMC Performance
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) is an ETF from Principal Funds. Over the past year HUSV returned +11.28% while USMC returned +9.85%. Year to date, HUSV is up 11.98% versus a gain of 11.54% for USMC.
Over three years, HUSV compounded at +11.41% per year against +21.10% for USMC; over five years the annualized figures are +6.37% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, USMC has the edge at +13.89% annualized vs +8.30%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
USMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for HUSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.7% for HUSV and -30.0% for USMC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUSV charges 0.70% per year while USMC charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $12 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUSV currently yields 1.40% against 0.74% for USMC.
Holdings Overlap
26.2% of HUSV's money is in holdings USMC also owns. 36.8% of USMC's money is in holdings HUSV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 101 in USMC, against full books of 203 and 213.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 73 positions for USMC that do not appear in our book for HUSV (63.3% of the fund), and 70 for HUSV that do not appear in USMC (72.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HUSV | Weight in USMC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple Inc | 2.31% | 9.89% | 7.58% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 1.81% | 10.23% | 8.42% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 2.65% | 1.48% | 1.17% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.71% | 0.88% | 0.83% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.91% | 1.35% | 0.44% |
| ADIAnalog Devices | 1.86% | 0.39% | 1.47% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.27% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.88% | 1.23% | 0.35% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 1.20% | 0.72% | 0.48% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.16% | 0.74% | 0.42% |
36.8% of USMC is already inside HUSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUSV or USMC?
HUSV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while USMC charges 0.12%. USMC is the cheaper option, by $58 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HUSV or USMC?
Over the past year HUSV returned +11.28% vs +9.85% for USMC, so HUSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HUSV annualized +8.30% vs +13.89% for USMC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HUSV or USMC?
USMC has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for HUSV. Worst drawdown: HUSV -35.7% vs USMC -30.0%.
Should I hold both HUSV and USMC?
HUSV and USMC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HUSV and USMC?
36.8% of USMC's money is in holdings HUSV also owns. 36.8% of USMC's is in holdings HUSV also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in HUSV and 101 in USMC.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUSV or USMC?
HUSV yields 1.40% while USMC yields 0.74%, so HUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USMC better than HUSV?
USMC has a lower expense ratio. HUSV led over 1Y, USMC over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HUSV is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.