IOO vs VYM
iShares Global 100 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, IOO or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IOO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $9.1B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 117 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.47%Best | +10.96% |
| 1Y Return | +22.77%Best | +15.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.81%Best | +17.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.57%Best | +12.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -57.9%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $21,525Best | $17,663 |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2000 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 22, 2026 (19.8 years).
IOO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
IOO vs VYM Performance
iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IOO returned +22.77% while VYM returned +15.42%. Year to date, IOO is up 15.47% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.
Over three years, IOO compounded at +26.81% per year against +17.78% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +16.57% and +12.05% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IOO has the edge at +7.60% annualized vs +6.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.9% for IOO and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IOO charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IOO currently yields 0.81% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
23.4% of IOO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 39.0% of VYM's money is in holdings IOO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
34 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IOO and 557 in VYM, against full books of 117 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 494 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IOO (58.1% of the fund), and 22 for IOO that do not appear in VYM (60.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IOO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.21% | 7.35% | 3.14% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 2.28% | 3.82% | 1.54% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.60% | 2.63% | 1.03% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.54% | 2.51% | 0.97% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.05% | 1.86% | 0.81% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.93% | 1.48% | 0.55% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.88% | 1.50% | 0.62% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.82% | 1.38% | 0.56% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.88% | 1.31% | 0.43% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.81% | 1.37% | 0.56% |
39.0% of VYM is already inside IOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IOO or VYM?
IOO has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IOO or VYM?
Over the past year IOO returned +22.77% vs +15.42% for VYM, so IOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IOO annualized +7.60% vs +6.80% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IOO or VYM?
IOO has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IOO -57.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IOO and VYM?
IOO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IOO and VYM?
39.0% of VYM's money is in holdings IOO also owns. 39.0% of VYM's is in holdings IOO also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in IOO and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IOO or VYM?
IOO yields 0.81% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than IOO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.