IUSV vs VYM
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, IUSV or VYM?
VYM has been ahead.
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. IUSV is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IUSV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04%Tie | 0.04%Tie |
| AUM | $27.7B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.66% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 743 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.76% | +12.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.15% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.40% | +17.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.64% | +12.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -66.9% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,342 | $17,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.1%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.8 years).
IUSV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
IUSV vs VYM Performance
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF (IUSV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IUSV returned +16.15% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, IUSV is up 10.76% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, IUSV compounded at +15.40% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.64% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.87% annualized vs +6.65%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.9% for IUSV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IUSV charges 0.04% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $4 annually. On income, IUSV currently yields 1.66% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
55.1% of IUSV's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 83.8% of VYM's money is in holdings IUSV also owns.
Most of VYM is already inside IUSV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
361 positions in common, counted across the 715 positions we hold weights for in IUSV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 743 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 168 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IUSV (13.5% of the fund), and 336 for IUSV that do not appear in VYM (43.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IUSV | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.96% | 3.82% | 2.86% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.09% | 2.63% | 0.54% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.82% | 2.51% | 1.69% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.27% | 1.66% | 0.39% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 1.21% | 1.48% | 0.27% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 1.11% | 1.52% | 0.41% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.77% | 1.80% | 1.03% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.64% | 1.86% | 1.22% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 1.14% | 1.31% | 0.17% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 1.06% | 1.37% | 0.31% |
83.8% of VYM is already inside IUSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IUSV or VYM?
IUSV has an expense ratio of 0.04% while VYM charges 0.04%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, IUSV or VYM?
Over the past year IUSV returned +16.15% vs +16.61% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IUSV annualized +6.65% vs +6.87% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IUSV or VYM?
IUSV has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IUSV -66.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IUSV and VYM?
IUSV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IUSV and VYM?
83.8% of VYM's money is in holdings IUSV also owns. 83.8% of VYM's is in holdings IUSV also owns. They hold 361 positions in common, counted across the 715 positions we hold weights for in IUSV and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IUSV or VYM?
IUSV yields 1.66% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than IUSV?
VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. IUSV is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.