IUSV vs IVV
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IUSV or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IUSV is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IUSV | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $27.7B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.66% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 743 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.76% | +12.27%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.15% | +17.04%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.40% | +21.24%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.64% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -66.9% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,342 | $18,490Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.1%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 24, 2000 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 4, 2000 to Sep 17, 2026 (26.1 years).
IUSV vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 26.1 years both funds cover.
IUSV vs IVV Performance
iShares Core S&P US Value ETF (IUSV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IUSV returned +16.15% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, IUSV is up 10.76% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.
Over three years, IUSV compounded at +15.40% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.64% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.86% annualized vs +6.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.9% for IUSV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IUSV charges 0.04% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $3 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IUSV currently yields 1.66% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
91.7% of IUSV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.0% of IVV's money is in holdings IUSV also owns.
Most of IUSV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
414 positions in common, counted across the 715 positions we hold weights for in IUSV and 490 in IVV, against full books of 743 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IUSV (38.7% of the fund), and 282 for IUSV that do not appear in IVV (7.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IUSV | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.28% | 7.02% | 0.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.74% | 3.84% | 0.10% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.09% | 1.01% | 1.08% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.23% | 1.56% | 0.33% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.96% | 1.44% | 0.48% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.44% | 0.69% | 0.75% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.38% | 0.67% | 0.71% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.31% | 0.63% | 0.68% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 1.27% | 0.61% | 0.66% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.06% |
91.7% of IUSV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IUSV or IVV?
IUSV has an expense ratio of 0.04% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IUSV or IVV?
Over the past year IUSV returned +16.15% vs +17.04% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IUSV annualized +6.57% vs +6.86% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IUSV or IVV?
IUSV has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IUSV -66.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IUSV and IVV?
IUSV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IUSV and IVV?
91.7% of IUSV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 60.0% of IVV's is in holdings IUSV also owns. They hold 414 positions in common, counted across the 715 positions we hold weights for in IUSV and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IUSV or IVV?
IUSV yields 1.66% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IUSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IUSV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. IUSV is less concentrated, with 22.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.