IVV vs KOMP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. KOMP delivered stronger 1-year returns.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KOMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $2.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.58% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +22.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +19.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +3.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 24.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -50.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 19, 2018 |
IVV vs KOMP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while KOMP returned +22.53%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 13.20% for KOMP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +19.80% for KOMP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.40% and +3.76% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, KOMP has the edge at +12.48% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -50.1% for KOMP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KOMP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.58% for KOMP.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KOMP share 120 holdings out of 888 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KOMP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KOMP charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KOMP?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +22.53% for KOMP, so KOMP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +12.48% for KOMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KOMP?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KOMP -50.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and KOMP?
IVV and KOMP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KOMP?
IVV and KOMP share 120 common holdings with a 13.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 888 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KOMP?
IVV yields 1.10% while KOMP yields 1.58%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.