IVV vs KOMP
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
Which is better, IVV or KOMP?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KOMP is less concentrated, with 10.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KOMP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.54% |
| Holdings | 508 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.85%Best | +10.44% |
| 1Y Return | +18.57%Best | +11.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.50%Best | +21.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34%Best | +2.60% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7%Best | 24.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -50.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,703Best | $11,369 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 10.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 19, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 25, 2026 (7.9 years).
IVV vs KOMP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KOMP Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% while KOMP returned +11.59%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.85% versus a gain of 10.44% for KOMP.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.50% per year against +21.72% for KOMP; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +2.60% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.09% annualized vs +11.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 16.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -50.1% for KOMP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KOMP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.54% for KOMP.
Holdings Overlap
47.2% of IVV's money is in holdings KOMP also owns. 25.7% of KOMP's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
116 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 500 in KOMP, against full books of 508 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 312 positions for KOMP that do not appear in our book for IVV (64.0% of the fund), and 365 for IVV that do not appear in KOMP (51.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KOMP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 0.79% | 7.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 0.13% | 6.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 0.22% | 5.47% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 0.11% | 2.54% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 0.21% | 2.18% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 0.62% | 1.28% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 0.71% | 0.85% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 0.45% | 1.18% |
| PTCPtc Inc | 0.03% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 0.10% | 0.87% |
47.2% of IVV is already inside KOMP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KOMP?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KOMP charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KOMP?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% vs +11.59% for KOMP, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +15.09% vs +11.96% for KOMP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KOMP?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 16.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs KOMP -50.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and KOMP?
IVV and KOMP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KOMP?
47.2% of IVV's money is in holdings KOMP also owns. 25.7% of KOMP's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 116 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 500 in KOMP.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KOMP?
IVV yields 1.06% while KOMP yields 1.54%, so KOMP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KOMP better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. KOMP is less concentrated, with 10.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.