KOMP vs SCHD
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, KOMP or SCHD?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KOMP led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. KOMP is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $2.7B | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 508 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +10.53% | +27.56%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +30.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.02% | +10.23%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,052 | $16,274Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.9%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.9 years).
KOMP vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
KOMP vs SCHD Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, KOMP is up 10.53% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +18.00% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +2.02% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.48% annualized vs +12.06%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 16.4% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $6 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of KOMP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 20.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings KOMP also owns.
SCHD and KOMP share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 508 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for KOMP (79.6% of the fund), and 420 for KOMP that do not appear in SCHD (88.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOMP | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.05% | 4.70% | 4.65% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group | 0.05% | 4.11% | 4.06% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 0.39% | 2.99% | 2.60% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.06% | 3.31% | 3.25% |
| QCOMQualcomm | 0.21% | 2.55% | 2.34% |
| FFord Motor Credit | 0.13% | 1.37% | 1.24% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 0.19% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
| CWENClearway Energy Inc Cl C | 0.07% | 0.10% | 0.03% |
20.1% of SCHD is already inside KOMP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or SCHD?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOMP or SCHD?
Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.06% vs +12.48% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOMP or SCHD?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 16.4% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KOMP and SCHD?
KOMP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and SCHD?
20.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings KOMP also owns. 20.1% of SCHD's is in holdings KOMP also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or SCHD?
KOMP yields 1.58% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than KOMP?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KOMP led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. KOMP is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.