KOMP vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, KOMP or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. KOMP led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. KOMP is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KOMP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2.7B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.58% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 508 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.53% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.69% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.00% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.02% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.7% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,052 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 9.9%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 19, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.9 years).
KOMP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
KOMP vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, KOMP is up 10.53% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, KOMP compounded at +18.00% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.02% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, KOMP has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +11.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOMP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.7% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.1% for KOMP and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KOMP charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KOMP currently yields 1.58% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
11.8% of KOMP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 24.9% of VYM's money is in holdings KOMP also owns.
VYM and KOMP share little of their money.
59 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 603 in VYM, against full books of 508 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 509 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for KOMP (72.6% of the fund), and 368 for KOMP that do not appear in VYM (77.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KOMP | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.12% | 7.29% | 7.17% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.10% | 2.54% | 2.44% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.37% | 1.93% | 1.56% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group, Inc. | 0.05% | 1.56% | 1.51% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 0.30% | 0.76% | 0.46% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.21% | 0.81% | 0.60% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.15% | 0.80% | 0.65% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 0.39% | 0.43% | 0.04% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 0.45% | 0.33% | 0.12% |
| NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp. | 0.46% | 0.28% | 0.18% |
24.9% of VYM is already inside KOMP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KOMP or VYM?
KOMP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KOMP or VYM?
Over the past year KOMP returned +18.69% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), KOMP annualized +12.06% vs +11.21% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KOMP or VYM?
KOMP has been the more volatile fund at 24.7% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: KOMP -50.1% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both KOMP and VYM?
KOMP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KOMP and VYM?
24.9% of VYM's money is in holdings KOMP also owns. 24.9% of VYM's is in holdings KOMP also owns. They hold 59 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in KOMP and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, KOMP or VYM?
KOMP yields 1.58% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than KOMP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. KOMP led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. KOMP is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.