IVV vs MBCE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or MBCE?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MBCE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.01% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $194M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 508 | 17 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | -2.87% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 23, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
IVV vs MBCE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs MBCE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Blue Chips Elite Index ETF (MBCE) is an ETF from Monarch Funds. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a loss of 2.87% for MBCE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MBCE charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $101 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.24% for MBCE.
Holdings Overlap
At least 20.8% of IVV's money is in holdings MBCE also owns.
Stated as a floor: for MBCE, our book for it covers 50.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and MBCE share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in MBCE, against full books of 508 and 17.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MBCE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 4.29% | 3.78% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.15% | 0.31% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.18% | 1.53% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 4.20% | 2.64% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 4.51% | 3.35% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 0.57% | 4.46% | 3.89% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.55% | 4.33% | 3.78% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.55% | 4.33% | 3.78% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 0.53% | 4.19% | 3.66% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.36% | 4.17% | 3.81% |
20.8% of IVV is already inside MBCE.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MBCE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MBCE charges 1.01%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $98 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MBCE?
At least 20.8% of IVV's money is in holdings MBCE also owns. Our book for MBCE is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 12 in MBCE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MBCE?
IVV yields 1.06% while MBCE yields 0.24%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MBCE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.