IVV vs NDOW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Anydrus Advantage ETF
Which is better, IVV or NDOW?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NDOW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 2.11% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $65M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.19% |
| Holdings | 508 | 88 |
| YTD Return | +12.51%Best | +4.11% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +8.49% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 7.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -8.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,951Best | $11,782 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Anydrus Capital |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 14, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.3 years).
IVV vs NDOW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NDOW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is an ETF from Anydrus Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while NDOW returned +8.49%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 4.11% for NDOW.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 7.6% for NDOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -8.8% for NDOW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NDOW charges 2.11%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $211 annually, a gap of $208 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.19% for NDOW.
Holdings Overlap
37.0% of IVV's money is in holdings NDOW also owns. 33.5% of NDOW's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
45 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 87 in NDOW, against full books of 508 and 88.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for NDOW that do not appear in our book for IVV (49.6% of the fund), and 450 for IVV that do not appear in NDOW (62.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NDOW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 2.20% | 5.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 1.22% | 4.22% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 1.26% | 2.75% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 0.77% | 2.21% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.56% | 1.16% | 1.40% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.59% | 0.08% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.94% | 0.52% | 1.42% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 1.45% | 0.84% | 0.61% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.65% | 1.04% | 0.39% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.93% | 0.70% | 0.23% |
37.0% of IVV is already inside NDOW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NDOW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NDOW charges 2.11%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $208 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NDOW?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +8.49% for NDOW, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +19.11% vs +7.39% for NDOW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NDOW?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 7.6% for NDOW. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs NDOW -8.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and NDOW?
IVV and NDOW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NDOW?
37.0% of IVV's money is in holdings NDOW also owns. 33.5% of NDOW's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 87 in NDOW.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NDOW?
IVV yields 1.06% while NDOW yields 1.19%, so NDOW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NDOW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.