NDOW vs VYM
Anydrus Advantage ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, NDOW or VYM?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NDOW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.11% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $65M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 88 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +4.11% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.49% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.6%Best | 10.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.8%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,782 | $14,329Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Anydrus Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 14, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 14, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (2.3 years).
NDOW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
NDOW vs VYM Performance
Anydrus Advantage ETF (NDOW) is an ETF from Anydrus Capital and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, NDOW is up 4.11% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.0% compared with 7.6% for NDOW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.8% for NDOW and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NDOW charges 2.11% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $211 vs $4 annually, a gap of $207 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NDOW currently yields 1.19% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
13.0% of NDOW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 20.7% of VYM's money is in holdings NDOW also owns.
VYM and NDOW share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, NDOW as of Aug 17, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 603 in VYM, against full books of 88 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 550 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for NDOW (76.8% of the fund), and 50 for NDOW that do not appear in VYM (70.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NDOW | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.77% | 7.29% | 6.52% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 0.84% | 3.38% | 2.54% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 0.70% | 2.54% | 1.84% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 1.04% | 1.85% | 0.81% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.81% | 1.42% | 0.61% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 0.99% | 0.27% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc. | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.22% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp. | 0.78% | 0.41% | 0.37% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp. | 0.87% | 0.24% | 0.63% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.73% | 0.28% | 0.45% |
20.7% of VYM is already inside NDOW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NDOW or VYM?
NDOW has an expense ratio of 2.11% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $207 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NDOW or VYM?
Over the past year NDOW returned +8.49% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), NDOW annualized +7.39% vs +16.93% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NDOW or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.0% annualized versus 7.6% for NDOW. Worst drawdown: NDOW -8.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both NDOW and VYM?
NDOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between NDOW and VYM?
20.7% of VYM's money is in holdings NDOW also owns. 20.7% of VYM's is in holdings NDOW also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in NDOW and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, NDOW or VYM?
NDOW yields 1.19% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than NDOW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.