IVV vs PCOV

IVV vs PCOV

Which is better, IVV or PCOV?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. PCOV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: PCOV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPCOV
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.34%
AUM$876.4B$10M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50849
YTD Return+11.51%Best-3.61%
1Y Return+15.96%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.01%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.66%-
Top 10 Weight37.8%32.6%Best
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)PRINCIPAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs PCOV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs PCOV Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Principal Equity Premium Income ETF (PCOV) is an ETF from PRINCIPAL EXCHANGE-TRADED FUNDS. Year to date, IVV is up 11.51% versus a loss of 3.61% for PCOV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PCOV charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for PCOV.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in PCOV29.8%
PCOV already in IVV88.2%

29.8% of IVV's money is in holdings PCOV also owns. 88.2% of PCOV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

Most of PCOV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

42 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 49 in PCOV, against full books of 508 and 49.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 3 positions for PCOV that do not appear in our book for IVV (5.1% of the fund), and 440 for IVV that do not appear in PCOV (68.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PCOVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.02%4.54%2.48%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.69%4.09%1.60%
JPMJpmorgan Chase1.44%4.02%2.58%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.00%2.33%0.67%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.65%2.24%0.41%
MSMorgan Stanley0.39%3.23%2.84%
COSTCostco Wholesale Corp.0.63%2.86%2.23%
MRKMerck & Company Inc0.55%2.70%2.15%
WMTWalmart, Inc.0.69%2.52%1.83%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.1.38%1.82%0.44%

88.2% of PCOV is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVPCOV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PCOV?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PCOV charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PCOV?

88.2% of PCOV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 88.2% of PCOV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 49 in PCOV.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PCOV?

IVV yields 1.06% while PCOV yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PCOV better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. PCOV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.