IVV vs PCR

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVPCRWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.76%
AUM$865.2B$2M
Dividend Yield1.09%8.86%
Holdings508256
YTD Return+13.72%-7.43%
1Y Return+21.64%-12.95%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.55%-
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%-
Max Drawdown-56.5%-20.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Simplify Exchange Traded Funds
CategoryEquityFixed Income
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 22, 2025

IVV vs PCR Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Simplify VettaFi Private Credit Strategy ETF (PCR) is a ETF from Simplify Exchange Traded Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while PCR returned -12.95%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a loss of 7.43% for PCR.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -20.1% for PCR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while PCR charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 8.86% for PCR.

Holdings Overlap

4.5%overlap

IVV and PCR share 48 holdings out of 650 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in PCRDifference
AAPL7.44%0.30%7.14%
META2.19%0.28%1.91%
JNJ0.93%0.29%0.64%
PMProProPro
MSProProPro
IBMProProPro
INTCProProPro
ANETProProPro
DELLProProPro
TTProProPro
FundXLS Pro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with PCR
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$45/quarter Pro · Cancel anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or PCR?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PCR charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or PCR?

Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs -12.95% for PCR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PCR?

IVV and PCR share 48 common holdings with a 4.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 650 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PCR?

IVV yields 1.09% while PCR yields 8.86%, so PCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.