IVV vs QQXT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQXT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $154M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.22% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 58 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +4.81% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +7.18% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +7.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +4.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -57.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 8, 2007 |
IVV vs QQXT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while QQXT returned +7.18%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 4.81% for QQXT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +7.60% for QQXT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +4.26% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQXT has the edge at +9.05% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQXT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -57.5% for QQXT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQXT charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.22% for QQXT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQXT share 49 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQXT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQXT charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQXT?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +7.18% for QQXT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +9.05% for QQXT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQXT?
QQXT has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQXT -57.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQXT?
IVV and QQXT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQXT?
IVV and QQXT share 49 common holdings with a 10.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQXT?
IVV yields 1.09% while QQXT yields 1.22%, so QQXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.