IVV vs RGLO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or RGLO?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, RGLO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. RGLO is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 508 | 384 |
| YTD Return | +13.85%Best | +12.93% |
| 1Y Return | +18.57% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.50% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.34% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 10.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -9.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,257Best | $13,216 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 29, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.3 years).
IVV vs RGLO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RGLO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% while RGLO returned +20.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.85% versus a gain of 12.93% for RGLO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 10.0% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -9.6% for RGLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RGLO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.57% for RGLO.
Holdings Overlap
60.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 48.7% of RGLO's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
98 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 343 in RGLO, against full books of 508 and 384.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for RGLO that do not appear in our book for IVV (1.6% of the fund), and 385 for IVV that do not appear in RGLO (38.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RGLO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 5.21% | 2.86% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 4.24% | 2.78% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 3.20% | 2.49% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.39% | 2.76% | 0.37% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 1.89% | 0.76% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 1.33% | 1.67% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.70% | 0.20% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 0.87% | 0.76% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 0.93% | 0.45% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 0.81% | 0.63% |
60.6% of IVV is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RGLO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RGLO charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RGLO?
Over the past year IVV returned +18.57% vs +20.00% for RGLO, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +24.22% vs +23.92% for RGLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RGLO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 10.0% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs RGLO -9.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and RGLO?
IVV and RGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RGLO?
60.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 48.7% of RGLO's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 98 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 343 in RGLO.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RGLO?
IVV yields 1.06% while RGLO yields 0.57%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGLO better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, RGLO over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. RGLO is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.