RGLO vs VYM
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, RGLO or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RGLO | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $361M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 384 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +12.08%Best | +10.00% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +13.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.63% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.9%Tie | 9.9%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -9.6% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,067Best | $12,492 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.2% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Russell Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 29, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1.3 years).
RGLO vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
RGLO vs VYM Performance
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF (RGLO) is an ETF from Russell Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RGLO returned +17.04% while VYM returned +13.75%. Year to date, RGLO is up 12.08% versus a gain of 10.00% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RGLO and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 9.9% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.6% for RGLO and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RGLO charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RGLO currently yields 0.57% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
13.5% of RGLO's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 42.1% of VYM's money is in holdings RGLO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 47 days apart, RGLO as of Sep 16, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
42 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 557 in VYM, against full books of 384 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 486 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for RGLO (54.9% of the fund), and 67 for RGLO that do not appear in VYM (38.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RGLO | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.75% | 7.35% | 5.60% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.82% | 3.82% | 3.00% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.57% | 2.63% | 2.06% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.64% | 2.51% | 1.87% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.63% | 1.66% | 1.03% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.71% | 1.52% | 0.81% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.34% | 1.86% | 1.52% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.37% | 1.80% | 1.43% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.37% | 1.48% | 1.11% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.46% | 1.31% | 0.85% |
42.1% of VYM is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RGLO or VYM?
RGLO has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RGLO or VYM?
Over the past year RGLO returned +17.04% vs +13.75% for VYM, so RGLO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RGLO annualized +22.85% vs +18.67% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RGLO or VYM?
RGLO and VYM have been equally volatile, both at 9.9% annualized. Worst drawdown: RGLO -9.6% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both RGLO and VYM?
RGLO and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RGLO and VYM?
42.1% of VYM's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 42.1% of VYM's is in holdings RGLO also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in RGLO and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, RGLO or VYM?
RGLO yields 0.57% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than RGLO?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RGLO led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.