IVV vs RISN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, IVV or RISN?
Large Cap Blend against Equity-oriented Balanced.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RISN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.72% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $72M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.16% |
| Holdings | 508 | 29 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +7.05% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +8.83% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +11.02% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +3.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.5% | -21.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $11,831 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 52.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Inspire ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Equity-oriented Balanced |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 15, 2020 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 16, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (6.1 years).
IVV vs RISN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RISN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF (RISN) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while RISN returned +8.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 7.05% for RISN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +11.02% for RISN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +3.42% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +16.81% annualized vs +6.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 11.1% for RISN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for IVV and -21.9% for RISN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RISN charges 0.72%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $72 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.16% for RISN.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of IVV's money is in holdings RISN also owns. 47.4% of RISN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in RISN, against full books of 508 and 29.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 28 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 481 positions RISN does not, 97.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RISN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.15% | 5.38% | 5.23% |
| ODFLOld Dominion Freig | 0.06% | 3.72% | 3.66% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 0.09% | 3.35% | 3.26% |
| EXPDExpeditors International Of Washington Inc | 0.04% | 3.40% | 3.36% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc Common Stock USD.001 | 0.03% | 3.41% | 3.38% |
| TPLTexas Pacific Land Trust | 0.03% | 3.31% | 3.28% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.53% | 2.71% | 2.18% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.16% | 2.85% | 2.69% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.06% | 2.93% | 2.87% |
| ORLYO'Eilly Automotive, Inc. | 0.12% | 2.75% | 2.63% |
47.4% of RISN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RISN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RISN charges 0.72%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RISN?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +8.83% for RISN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +16.81% vs +6.32% for RISN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RISN?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 11.1% for RISN. Worst drawdown: IVV -24.5% vs RISN -21.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and RISN?
IVV and RISN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RISN?
47.4% of RISN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 47.4% of RISN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 28 in RISN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RISN?
IVV yields 1.10% while RISN yields 1.16%, so RISN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RISN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.