IVV vs ROE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ROE delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $262M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.00% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +23.35% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +36.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +22.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 1, 2023 |
IVV vs ROE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while ROE returned +36.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 23.35% for ROE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +22.82% for ROE. Across the full 3-year window we track, ROE has the edge at +21.77% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for ROE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.1% for ROE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROE charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.00% for ROE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and ROE share 83 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROE charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or ROE?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +36.69% for ROE, so ROE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +21.77% for ROE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for ROE. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs ROE -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROE?
IVV and ROE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROE?
IVV and ROE share 83 common holdings with a 28.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROE?
IVV yields 1.09% while ROE yields 1.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.