IVV vs ROE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
Which is better, IVV or ROE?
ROE has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ROE led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ROE is less concentrated, with 13.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | ROE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $281M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.98% |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +12.27% | +20.55%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.04% | +27.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | +23.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 14.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $17,295 | $17,634Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 13.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Astoria Portfolio Advisors |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 1, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2023 to Sep 17, 2026 (3.1 years).
IVV vs ROE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs ROE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is an ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while ROE returned +27.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 20.55% for ROE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.24% per year against +23.05% for ROE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ROE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.1% for ROE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while ROE charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.98% for ROE.
Holdings Overlap
57.6% of IVV's money is in holdings ROE also owns. 84.9% of ROE's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of ROE is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
85 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in ROE, against full books of 508 and 102.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 13 positions for ROE that do not appear in our book for IVV (12.6% of the fund), and 397 for IVV that do not appear in ROE (41.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in ROE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 1.09% | 6.98% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 1.12% | 5.90% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 1.39% | 4.30% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 1.11% | 2.73% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 0.97% | 2.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 0.93% | 1.72% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.01% | 0.89% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 0.95% | 0.61% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 1.03% | 0.41% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 0.76% | 0.87% |
84.9% of ROE is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or ROE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ROE charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or ROE?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +27.50% for ROE, so ROE leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or ROE?
ROE has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs ROE -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and ROE?
IVV and ROE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and ROE?
84.9% of ROE's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 84.9% of ROE's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 85 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 101 in ROE.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or ROE?
IVV yields 1.06% while ROE yields 0.98%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ROE better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ROE led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ROE is less concentrated, with 13.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.