ROE vs VYM
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ROE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ROE | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $262M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +23.25% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.10% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.21% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Astoria Portfolio Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ROE vs VYM Performance
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is a ETF from Astoria Portfolio Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROE returned +37.10% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, ROE is up 23.25% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, ROE compounded at +22.21% per year against +18.25% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, ROE has the edge at +21.80% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.5% for ROE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for ROE and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ROE charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROE currently yields 1.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ROE and VYM share 44 holdings out of 615 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ROE or VYM?
ROE has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ROE or VYM?
Over the past year ROE returned +37.10% vs +26.12% for VYM, so ROE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ROE annualized +21.80% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ROE or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.5% for ROE. Worst drawdown: ROE -19.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ROE and VYM?
ROE and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ROE and VYM?
ROE and VYM share 44 common holdings with a 19.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 615 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ROE or VYM?
ROE yields 1.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.