IVV vs SAMT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
Which is better, IVV or SAMT?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window, SAMT over 3Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SAMT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.66% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $830M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.63% |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | +9.32% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | +15.04% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | +24.51%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 16.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1% | -20.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.7 years | $19,138Best | $17,695 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strategas Asset Management, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 25, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 25, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.7 years).
IVV vs SAMT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SAMT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT) is an ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while SAMT returned +15.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 9.32% for SAMT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.17% per year against +24.51% for SAMT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -20.6% for SAMT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SAMT charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $66 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.63% for SAMT.
Holdings Overlap
At least 21.7% of IVV's money is in holdings SAMT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for SAMT, our book for it covers 91.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and SAMT share little of their money.
28 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 42 in SAMT, against full books of 508 and 42.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SAMT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 2.13% | 3.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 2.64% | 1.20% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 2.26% | 0.74% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 2.62% | 1.24% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 3.04% | 2.09% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 2.23% | 0.79% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.68% | 2.96% | 2.28% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 2.55% | 1.58% |
| TGTTarget Corp Common Stock Usd.0833 | 0.11% | 3.37% | 3.26% |
| PSXPhillips 66 | 0.15% | 3.28% | 3.13% |
21.7% of IVV is already inside SAMT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SAMT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SAMT charges 0.66%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SAMT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs +15.04% for SAMT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SAMT?
SAMT has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs SAMT -20.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SAMT?
IVV and SAMT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SAMT?
At least 21.7% of IVV's money is in holdings SAMT also owns. Our book for SAMT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 42 in SAMT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SAMT?
IVV yields 1.06% while SAMT yields 0.63%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAMT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window, SAMT over 3Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.