IVV vs SUSL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SUSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SUSL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.10% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.95% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 269 | |
| YTD Return | +12.28% | +13.08% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.94% | +23.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.81% | +22.23% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +13.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | May 7, 2019 |
IVV vs SUSL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF (SUSL) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% while SUSL returned +23.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.28% versus a gain of 13.08% for SUSL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.81% per year against +22.23% for SUSL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +13.11% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SUSL has the edge at +16.44% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SUSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -34.3% for SUSL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SUSL charges 0.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $10 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.95% for SUSL.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SUSL share 235 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.8% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SUSL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SUSL charges 0.10%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SUSL?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.94% vs +23.37% for SUSL, so SUSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +16.44% for SUSL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SUSL?
SUSL has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SUSL -34.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and SUSL?
IVV and SUSL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SUSL?
IVV and SUSL share 235 common holdings with a 50.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SUSL?
IVV yields 1.10% while SUSL yields 0.95%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.