IVV vs TIME
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Clockwise US Core Equity ETF
Which is better, IVV or TIME?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TIME |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.96% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $15M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 9.41% |
| Holdings | 508 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +10.13% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +13.11% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38%Best | +17.17% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6%Best | 24.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.1%Best | -42.2% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $18,330Best | $14,345 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 48.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Clockwise Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 27, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 28, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.6 years).
IVV vs TIME growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TIME Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Clockwise US Core Equity ETF (TIME) is an ETF from Clockwise Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TIME returned +13.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 10.13% for TIME.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +17.17% for TIME.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TIME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.4% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.1% for IVV and -42.2% for TIME. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TIME charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 9.41% for TIME.
Holdings Overlap
43.5% of IVV's money is in holdings TIME also owns. 74.8% of TIME's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of TIME is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
31 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TIME, against full books of 508 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for TIME that do not appear in our book for IVV (23.2% of the fund), and 451 for IVV that do not appear in TIME (55.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TIME | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 10.43% | 3.41% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 7.22% | 0.85% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 5.10% | 0.59% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 4.07% | 1.07% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 2.96% | 0.88% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.81% | 1.16% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.67% | 3.85% | 3.18% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 3.10% | 1.94% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 2.16% | 0.60% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 1.01% | 2.20% | 1.19% |
74.8% of TIME is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TIME?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TIME charges 0.96%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $93 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TIME?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +13.11% for TIME, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TIME?
TIME has been the more volatile fund at 24.4% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -22.1% vs TIME -42.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and TIME?
IVV and TIME have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TIME?
74.8% of TIME's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 74.8% of TIME's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TIME.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TIME?
IVV yields 1.06% while TIME yields 9.41%, so TIME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TIME better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.