IVV vs TIME

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTIMEWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.96%
AUM$865.2B$15M
Dividend Yield1.09%16.47%
Holdings50839
YTD Return+13.80%+8.90%
1Y Return+23.70%+15.17%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+16.55%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%24.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-42.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Clockwise Capital
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 27, 2022

IVV vs TIME Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Clockwise US Core Equity ETF (TIME) is a ETF from Clockwise Capital. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while TIME returned +15.17%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 8.90% for TIME.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +16.55% for TIME. Across the full 5-year window we track, TIME has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TIME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -42.2% for TIME. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TIME charges 0.96%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $96 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 16.47% for TIME.

Holdings Overlap

42.6%overlap

IVV and TIME share 29 holdings out of 521 unique holdings combined, representing a 42.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TIMEDifference
AAPL7.44%10.34%2.90%
NVDA7.76%9.77%2.01%
GOOGL3.15%7.00%3.85%
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with TIME
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TIME?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TIME charges 0.96%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or TIME?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +15.17% for TIME, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +8.10% for TIME. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or TIME?

TIME has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TIME -42.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and TIME?

IVV and TIME have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TIME?

IVV and TIME share 29 common holdings with a 42.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 521 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TIME?

IVV yields 1.09% while TIME yields 16.47%, so TIME currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →