IYK vs VTI
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IYK or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IYK | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.54% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.03% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.00% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.71% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.01% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 15.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.1%Best | -56.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,389 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Oct 2, 2026 (25.3 years).
IYK vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
IYK vs VTI Performance
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IYK returned +7.00% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, IYK is up 8.03% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, IYK compounded at +7.71% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.01% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +7.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.2% for IYK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.1% for IYK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IYK charges 0.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IYK currently yields 2.54% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.5% of IYK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.4% of VTI's money is in holdings IYK also owns.
Most of IYK is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
51 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in IYK and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,105 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IYK (94.1% of the fund), and 2 for IYK that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IYK | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 13.30% | 0.42% | 12.88% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 13.09% | 0.47% | 12.62% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 11.59% | 0.41% | 11.18% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 7.34% | 0.26% | 7.08% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 4.21% | 0.18% | 4.03% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 4.11% | 0.16% | 3.95% |
| MCKMckesson Corp. | 4.09% | 0.14% | 3.95% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 3.26% | 0.11% | 3.15% |
| CLColgate-Palmolive Co | 2.90% | 0.10% | 2.80% |
| CORCencora Inc | 2.77% | 0.08% | 2.69% |
99.5% of IYK is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IYK or VTI?
IYK has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IYK or VTI?
Over the past year IYK returned +7.00% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IYK annualized +7.19% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IYK or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.2% for IYK. Worst drawdown: IYK -44.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IYK and VTI?
IYK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IYK and VTI?
99.5% of IYK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 3.4% of VTI's is in holdings IYK also owns. They hold 51 positions in common, counted across the 54 positions we hold weights for in IYK and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IYK or VTI?
IYK yields 2.54% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IYK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IYK?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.