IYK vs VTI
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IYK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.07% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.05% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.89% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.59% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 12, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
IYK vs VTI Performance
iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IYK returned +8.05% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, IYK is up 14.07% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, IYK compounded at +7.89% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.59% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +7.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.1% for IYK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.1% for IYK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IYK charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IYK currently yields 2.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IYK and VTI share 45 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IYK or VTI?
IYK has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IYK or VTI?
Over the past year IYK returned +8.05% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IYK annualized +7.22% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IYK or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.1% for IYK. Worst drawdown: IYK -44.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IYK and VTI?
IYK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IYK and VTI?
IYK and VTI share 45 common holdings with a 3.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IYK or VTI?
IYK yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IYK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.