JAVA vs QQQ
JPMorgan Active Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, JAVA or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. JAVA is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JAVA | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $7.1B | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 155 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.62% | +17.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.83% | +22.10%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.88% | +25.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.88% | +14.60%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 20.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,529 | $19,766Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5 years).
JAVA vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover.
JAVA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JAVA returned +19.83% while QQQ returned +22.10%. Year to date, JAVA is up 12.62% versus a gain of 17.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, JAVA compounded at +16.88% per year against +25.27% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.88% and +14.60% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 14.4% for JAVA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for JAVA and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JAVA charges 0.44% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $18 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JAVA currently yields 1.18% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
27.9% of JAVA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 49.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings JAVA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 155 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 70 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for JAVA (48.4% of the fund), and 124 for JAVA that do not appear in QQQ (70.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JAVA | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.27% | 4.67% | 2.60% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.87% | 5.76% | 0.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.05% | 7.27% | 4.22% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 0.57% | 8.44% | 7.87% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.81% | 2.78% | 0.97% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.21% | 3.45% | 3.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.35% | 3.13% | 2.78% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.42% | 2.41% | 1.99% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.50% | 2.23% | 1.73% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp 3.125 06/15/2060 | 0.20% | 1.69% | 1.49% |
49.1% of QQQ is already inside JAVA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JAVA or QQQ?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JAVA or QQQ?
Over the past year JAVA returned +19.83% vs +22.10% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JAVA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 14.4% for JAVA. Worst drawdown: JAVA -16.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both JAVA and QQQ?
JAVA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JAVA and QQQ?
49.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings JAVA also owns. 49.1% of QQQ's is in holdings JAVA also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 155 positions we hold weights for in JAVA and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, JAVA or QQQ?
JAVA yields 1.18% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than JAVA?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. JAVA is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.