JAVA vs QQQ
JPMorgan Active Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. JAVA delivered stronger 1-year returns. JAVA offers more diversification with 149 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JAVA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $7.0B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.32% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 150 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.64% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.11% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.30% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 4, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
JAVA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JAVA returned +30.11% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, JAVA is up 15.64% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, JAVA compounded at +17.30% per year against +25.54% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for JAVA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.5% for JAVA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JAVA charges 0.44% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $18 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JAVA currently yields 1.32% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
JAVA and QQQ share 29 holdings out of 223 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JAVA or QQQ?
JAVA has an expense ratio of 0.44% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, JAVA or QQQ?
Over the past year JAVA returned +30.11% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so JAVA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), JAVA annualized +12.79% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, JAVA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for JAVA. Worst drawdown: JAVA -16.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both JAVA and QQQ?
JAVA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between JAVA and QQQ?
JAVA and QQQ share 29 common holdings with a 21.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 223 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, JAVA or QQQ?
JAVA yields 1.32% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so JAVA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.