KRMA vs VOO
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRMA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $118M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 145 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.19% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.76% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.08% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.89% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
KRMA vs VOO Performance
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KRMA returned +19.76% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, KRMA is up 10.19% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, KRMA compounded at +16.08% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.89% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +12.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for KRMA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRMA charges 0.43% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRMA currently yields 2.42% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
KRMA and VOO share 128 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KRMA or VOO?
Over the past year KRMA returned +19.76% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), KRMA annualized +12.83% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KRMA -36.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KRMA and VOO?
KRMA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KRMA and VOO?
KRMA and VOO share 128 common holdings with a 52.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA yields 2.42% while VOO yields 1.09%, so KRMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.