KRMA vs VOO
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, KRMA or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. KRMA is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRMA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $118M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 145 | 509 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 10 years | $33,438 | $37,596Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.8%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 59 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. KRMA has data through Jul 21, 2026 and VOO through Sep 18, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 10 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 12, 2016 to Jul 21, 2026 (10 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for KRMA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRMA charges 0.43% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRMA currently yields 2.42% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
91.1% of KRMA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.5% of VOO's money is in holdings KRMA also owns.
Most of KRMA is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 92 days apart, KRMA as of Apr 30, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
126 positions in common, counted across the 143 positions we hold weights for in KRMA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 145 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 361 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for KRMA (35.7% of the fund), and 17 for KRMA that do not appear in VOO (8.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KRMA | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.44% | 7.55% | 0.11% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.82% | 7.05% | 1.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.93% | 5.36% | 1.43% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.39% | 3.24% | 2.15% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.17% | 4.13% | 0.96% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.25% | 2.86% | 0.61% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.21% | 1.90% | 0.69% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.84% | 1.44% | 0.60% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.84% | 1.36% | 0.52% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.77% | 1.21% | 0.44% |
91.1% of KRMA is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: KRMA -36.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both KRMA and VOO?
KRMA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KRMA and VOO?
91.1% of KRMA's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 63.5% of VOO's is in holdings KRMA also owns. They hold 126 positions in common, counted across the 143 positions we hold weights for in KRMA and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRMA or VOO?
KRMA yields 2.42% while VOO yields 1.04%, so KRMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than KRMA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.99. KRMA is less concentrated, with 31.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.