KRMA vs VTI
Global X Conscious Companies ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KRMA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.43% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $118M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.42% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 145 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.19% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.76% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.08% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.89% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 11, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
KRMA vs VTI Performance
Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KRMA returned +19.76% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, KRMA is up 10.19% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, KRMA compounded at +16.08% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.89% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, KRMA has the edge at +12.83% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KRMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.2% for KRMA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KRMA charges 0.43% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KRMA currently yields 2.42% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KRMA and VTI share 136 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 49.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KRMA or VTI?
KRMA has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KRMA or VTI?
Over the past year KRMA returned +19.76% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), KRMA annualized +12.83% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KRMA or VTI?
KRMA has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KRMA -36.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KRMA and VTI?
KRMA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between KRMA and VTI?
KRMA and VTI share 136 common holdings with a 49.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KRMA or VTI?
KRMA yields 2.42% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KRMA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.