KXI vs VTI
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KXI | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 112 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.51% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.42% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.90% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.72% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
KXI vs VTI Performance
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KXI returned +6.42% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, KXI is up 8.51% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, KXI compounded at +7.90% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.72% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.7% for KXI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.9% for KXI and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KXI charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KXI currently yields 2.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
KXI and VTI share 33 holdings out of 2848 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KXI or VTI?
KXI has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KXI or VTI?
Over the past year KXI returned +6.42% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), KXI annualized +5.87% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KXI or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.7% for KXI. Worst drawdown: KXI -43.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both KXI and VTI?
KXI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KXI and VTI?
KXI and VTI share 33 common holdings with a 4.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2848 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KXI or VTI?
KXI yields 2.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so KXI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.