LCDS vs VTI
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LCDS or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LCDS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCDS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $16M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.86% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 115 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.37%Best | +12.28% |
| 1Y Return | +17.59%Best | +16.78% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.89% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.94% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,601 | $14,670Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.8% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.1 years).
LCDS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
LCDS vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCDS returned +17.59% while VTI returned +16.78%. Year to date, LCDS is up 12.37% versus a gain of 12.28% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 12.1% for LCDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for LCDS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCDS charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCDS currently yields 0.86% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.3% of LCDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 54.8% of VTI's money is in holdings LCDS also owns.
Most of LCDS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
109 positions in common, counted across the 113 positions we hold weights for in LCDS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 115 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,041 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LCDS (42.6% of the fund), and 3 for LCDS that do not appear in VTI (1.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCDS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.86% | 6.40% | 2.46% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.05% | 6.29% | 0.76% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.49% | 4.79% | 1.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.34% | 3.65% | 0.69% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.85% | 2.90% | 1.95% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.45% | 2.56% | 0.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.37% | 1.70% | 0.67% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.39% | 1.29% | 1.10% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.85% | 0.89% | 0.96% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.36% | 1.35% | 0.01% |
98.3% of LCDS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCDS or VTI?
LCDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LCDS or VTI?
Over the past year LCDS returned +17.59% vs +16.78% for VTI, so LCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LCDS annualized +19.75% vs +20.02% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LCDS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 12.1% for LCDS. Worst drawdown: LCDS -18.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LCDS and VTI?
LCDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LCDS and VTI?
98.3% of LCDS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 54.8% of VTI's is in holdings LCDS also owns. They hold 109 positions in common, counted across the 113 positions we hold weights for in LCDS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCDS or VTI?
LCDS yields 0.86% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LCDS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LCDS led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.