LCDS vs VTI
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LCDS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCDS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 114 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.94% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.41% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
LCDS vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCDS returned +22.41% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, LCDS is up 13.94% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.3% for LCDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.4% for LCDS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCDS charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCDS currently yields 0.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LCDS and VTI share 106 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 49.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCDS or VTI?
LCDS has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCDS or VTI?
Over the past year LCDS returned +22.41% vs +22.19% for VTI, so LCDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LCDS annualized +21.65% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCDS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.3% for LCDS. Worst drawdown: LCDS -18.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LCDS and VTI?
LCDS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LCDS and VTI?
LCDS and VTI share 106 common holdings with a 49.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCDS or VTI?
LCDS yields 0.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.