LCF vs VOO
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $66M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +10.93% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.02% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.13% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Touchstone Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LCF vs VOO Performance
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is a ETF from Touchstone Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCF returned +18.02% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, LCF is up 10.93% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, LCF compounded at +18.13% per year against +21.78% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, LCF has the edge at +16.70% annualized vs +13.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 14.1% for LCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for LCF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCF charges 0.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCF currently yields 0.54% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LCF and VOO share 39 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCF or VOO?
LCF has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LCF or VOO?
Over the past year LCF returned +18.02% vs +23.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LCF annualized +16.70% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LCF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 14.1% for LCF. Worst drawdown: LCF -18.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LCF and VOO?
LCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LCF and VOO?
LCF and VOO share 39 common holdings with a 39.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCF or VOO?
LCF yields 0.54% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.