LCF vs VOO
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, LCF or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LCF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 46 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +10.65% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.66% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.25% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.85% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.3%Best | -18.7% |
| $10,000 over 4.1 years | $18,462 | $19,752Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.0% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Touchstone Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 27, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 29, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.1 years).
LCF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.
LCF vs VOO Performance
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LCF returned +11.66% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, LCF is up 10.65% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, LCF compounded at +19.25% per year against +23.16% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +18.06% annualized vs +16.13%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.0% for LCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.3% for LCF and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LCF charges 0.56% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $3 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LCF currently yields 0.50% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
91.2% of LCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.5% of VOO's money is in holdings LCF also owns.
Most of LCF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
39 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in LCF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 46 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 45 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 448 positions LCF does not, 56.6% of the fund.
Largest: GOOGL 3.24%, JPM 1.46%, MU 1.44%, LLY 1.41%, TSLA 1.36%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LCF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.71% | 7.55% | 0.16% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.92% | 7.05% | 0.87% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.99% | 5.36% | 3.63% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 8.32% | 2.62% | 5.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.72% | 4.13% | 1.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.39% | 1.90% | 3.49% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.21% | 2.86% | 0.65% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 3.34% | 0.63% | 2.71% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.47% | 1.00% | 1.47% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.26% | 0.93% | 1.33% |
91.2% of LCF is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LCF or VOO?
LCF has an expense ratio of 0.56% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $53 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LCF or VOO?
Over the past year LCF returned +11.66% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), LCF annualized +16.13% vs +18.06% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LCF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.0% for LCF. Worst drawdown: LCF -18.3% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both LCF and VOO?
LCF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LCF and VOO?
91.2% of LCF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 42.5% of VOO's is in holdings LCF also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 45 positions we hold weights for in LCF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, LCF or VOO?
LCF yields 0.50% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than LCF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.