LDRX vs QQQ
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LDRX or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDRX | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $252M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 104 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +12.23% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.17% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0%Best | 19.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6%Best | -12.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,000 | $15,060Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.3% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 5, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).
LDRX vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
LDRX vs QQQ Performance
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is an ETF from Summit Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LDRX returned +16.17% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, LDRX is up 12.23% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 14.0% for LDRX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LDRX and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDRX charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDRX currently yields 1.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
65.3% of LDRX's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 71.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings LDRX also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside LDRX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in LDRX and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 104 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 103 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 62 positions LDRX does not, 26.4% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 3.13%, PANW 1.30%, KLAC 1.11%, CRWD 0.94%, SPCX 0.91%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LDRX | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.13% | 8.44% | 2.69% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.69% | 7.27% | 2.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 7.82% | 5.76% | 2.06% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 7.59% | 3.36% | 4.23% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.27% | 4.67% | 0.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.69% | 3.16% | 0.53% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.34% | 4.43% | 2.09% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.61% | 2.78% | 0.17% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.60% | 3.45% | 1.85% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.18% | 2.56% | 0.38% |
71.2% of QQQ is already inside LDRX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDRX or QQQ?
LDRX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LDRX or QQQ?
Over the past year LDRX returned +16.17% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LDRX annualized +27.17% vs +33.97% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LDRX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 14.0% for LDRX. Worst drawdown: LDRX -10.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both LDRX and QQQ?
LDRX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LDRX and QQQ?
71.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings LDRX also owns. 71.2% of QQQ's is in holdings LDRX also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 103 positions we hold weights for in LDRX and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDRX or QQQ?
LDRX yields 1.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so LDRX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LDRX?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.