LDRX vs QQQ
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDRX | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $256M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.46% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.40% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
LDRX vs QQQ Performance
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LDRX returned +21.40% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, LDRX is up 11.46% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.4% for LDRX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LDRX and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDRX charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDRX currently yields 1.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
LDRX and QQQ share 34 holdings out of 170 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDRX or QQQ?
LDRX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LDRX or QQQ?
Over the past year LDRX returned +21.40% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LDRX annualized +28.51% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LDRX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.4% for LDRX. Worst drawdown: LDRX -10.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both LDRX and QQQ?
LDRX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LDRX and QQQ?
LDRX and QQQ share 34 common holdings with a 52.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 170 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDRX or QQQ?
LDRX yields 1.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so LDRX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.