LDRX vs VTI
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LDRX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LDRX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $241M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.11% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 105 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.04% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.58% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Summit Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
LDRX vs VTI Performance
SGI Enhanced Market Leaders ETF (LDRX) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LDRX returned +23.58% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, LDRX is up 12.04% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.4% for LDRX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for LDRX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LDRX charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LDRX currently yields 1.11% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LDRX and VTI share 99 holdings out of 2786 unique holdings combined, representing a 59.1% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LDRX or VTI?
LDRX has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LDRX or VTI?
Over the past year LDRX returned +23.58% vs +23.31% for VTI, so LDRX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), LDRX annualized +29.53% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LDRX or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.4% for LDRX. Worst drawdown: LDRX -10.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LDRX and VTI?
LDRX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LDRX and VTI?
LDRX and VTI share 99 common holdings with a 59.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2786 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LDRX or VTI?
LDRX yields 1.11% while VTI yields 1.07%, so LDRX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.