LRGE vs VOO
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LRGE | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $362M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 30 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +7.87% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.17% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.05% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.02% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
LRGE vs VOO Performance
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF (LRGE) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LRGE returned +11.17% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, LRGE is up 7.87% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, LRGE compounded at +18.05% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.02% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, LRGE has the edge at +15.37% annualized vs +13.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LRGE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for LRGE and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LRGE charges 0.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $3 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LRGE currently yields 0.12% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
LRGE and VOO share 26 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LRGE or VOO?
LRGE has an expense ratio of 0.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LRGE or VOO?
Over the past year LRGE returned +11.17% vs +22.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), LRGE annualized +15.37% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LRGE or VOO?
LRGE has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: LRGE -37.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both LRGE and VOO?
LRGE and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LRGE and VOO?
LRGE and VOO share 26 common holdings with a 29.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LRGE or VOO?
LRGE yields 0.12% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.