LSVD vs QQQ
LSV Disciplined Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LSVD or QQQ?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSVD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $672M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 132 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +21.55%Best | +15.94% |
| 1Y Return | +31.22%Best | +20.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.26% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5%Best | 19.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3%Best | -22.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $14,821Best | $13,755 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.1%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | LSV Asset Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (1.7 years).
LSVD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
LSVD vs QQQ Performance
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is an ETF from LSV Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LSVD returned +31.22% while QQQ returned +20.44%. Year to date, LSVD is up 21.55% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 13.5% for LSVD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for LSVD and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSVD charges 0.40% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $18 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSVD currently yields 0.26% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
43.9% of LSVD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 62.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings LSVD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
26 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 132 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 135 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 70 positions LSVD does not, 35.6% of the fund.
Largest: WMT 2.41%, INTC 2.23%, COST 1.84%, PLTR 1.60%, NFLX 1.37%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LSVD | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 6.50% | 8.44% | 1.94% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.38% | 7.27% | 1.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.29% | 5.76% | 2.47% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.83% | 4.67% | 0.84% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.61% | 3.36% | 0.25% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.93% | 4.43% | 2.50% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.06% | 3.13% | 0.07% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.20% | 2.78% | 0.58% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.15% | 3.16% | 2.01% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.56% | 3.45% | 2.89% |
62.0% of QQQ is already inside LSVD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSVD or QQQ?
LSVD has an expense ratio of 0.40% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LSVD or QQQ?
Over the past year LSVD returned +31.22% vs +20.44% for QQQ, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LSVD annualized +26.04% vs +20.63% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, LSVD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 13.5% for LSVD. Worst drawdown: LSVD -19.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both LSVD and QQQ?
LSVD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LSVD and QQQ?
62.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings LSVD also owns. 62.0% of QQQ's is in holdings LSVD also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 135 positions we hold weights for in LSVD and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSVD or QQQ?
LSVD yields 0.26% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LSVD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LSVD led over 1Y and the full window. LSVD is less concentrated, with 33.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.