LSVD vs VTI
LSV Disciplined Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LSVD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LSVD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $671M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 132 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.79% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.06% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | LSV Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
LSVD vs VTI Performance
LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is a ETF from LSV Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LSVD returned +35.06% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, LSVD is up 21.79% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.8% for LSVD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.3% for LSVD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LSVD charges 0.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LSVD currently yields 0.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
LSVD and VTI share 112 holdings out of 2806 unique holdings combined, representing a 42.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LSVD or VTI?
LSVD has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LSVD or VTI?
Over the past year LSVD returned +35.06% vs +22.43% for VTI, so LSVD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), LSVD annualized +27.70% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LSVD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.8% for LSVD. Worst drawdown: LSVD -19.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both LSVD and VTI?
LSVD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between LSVD and VTI?
LSVD and VTI share 112 common holdings with a 42.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2806 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LSVD or VTI?
LSVD yields 0.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.