MAVF vs REVS
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Which is better, MAVF or REVS?
Each has led over a different period.
REVS has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over the full window, REVS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | REVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $94M | $395M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.75% |
| Holdings | 84 | 609 |
| YTD Return | +15.34% | +21.93%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.67% | +26.09%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $13,814Best | $13,711 |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Nov 13, 2026 (1.7 years).
MAVF vs REVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs REVS Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year MAVF returned +20.67% while REVS returned +26.09%. Year to date, MAVF is up 15.34% versus a gain of 21.93% for REVS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 10.7% for REVS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -14.5% for REVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while REVS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $19 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.38% against 1.75% for REVS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in MAVF and 299 in REVS, totalling 1.1% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 299 in REVS, against full books of 84 and 609.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of MAVF and REVS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while REVS charges 0.19%. REVS is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or REVS?
Over the past year MAVF returned +20.67% vs +26.09% for REVS, so REVS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.93% vs +20.40% for REVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 10.7% for REVS. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs REVS -14.5%.
Should I hold both MAVF and REVS?
MAVF and REVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF yields 0.38% while REVS yields 1.75%, so REVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REVS better than MAVF?
REVS has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over the full window, REVS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.