NOBL vs VTI
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NOBL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.04% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 70 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +12.42% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.13% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.12% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.62% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 9, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
NOBL vs VTI Performance
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NOBL returned +13.13% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, NOBL is up 12.42% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, NOBL compounded at +10.12% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.62% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, NOBL has the edge at +9.46% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for NOBL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for NOBL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NOBL charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NOBL currently yields 2.04% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NOBL and VTI share 62 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VTI?
NOBL has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NOBL or VTI?
Over the past year NOBL returned +13.13% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), NOBL annualized +9.46% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NOBL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for NOBL. Worst drawdown: NOBL -35.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NOBL and VTI?
NOBL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NOBL and VTI?
NOBL and VTI share 62 common holdings with a 9.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NOBL or VTI?
NOBL yields 2.04% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NOBL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.