OMFL vs VTI
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.9B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.81% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 635 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +14.76% | +12.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.10% | +20.47% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.02% | +21.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.30% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
OMFL vs VTI Performance
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFL returned +20.10% while VTI returned +20.47%. Year to date, OMFL is up 14.76% versus a gain of 12.79% for VTI.
Over three years, OMFL compounded at +15.02% per year against +21.53% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +9.30% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, OMFL has the edge at +14.03% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OMFL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFL charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFL currently yields 0.81% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OMFL and VTI share 489 holdings out of 2869 unique holdings combined, representing a 60.1% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFL or VTI?
OMFL has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OMFL or VTI?
Over the past year OMFL returned +20.10% vs +20.47% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFL annualized +14.03% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OMFL or VTI?
OMFL has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: OMFL -33.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OMFL and VTI?
OMFL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFL and VTI?
OMFL and VTI share 489 common holdings with a 60.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2869 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFL or VTI?
OMFL yields 0.81% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.