OMFL vs VOO
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, OMFL or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. OMFL is less concentrated, with 36.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OMFL | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.8B | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.79% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 1,272 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +16.02%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +20.03%Best | +18.67% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.78% | +22.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +13.91%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2%Best | -34.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,923 | $19,178Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.6%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 10, 2017 to Oct 13, 2026 (8.9 years).
OMFL vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.9 years both funds cover.
OMFL vs VOO Performance
Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFL returned +20.03% while VOO returned +18.67%. Year to date, OMFL is up 16.02% versus a gain of 14.82% for VOO.
Over three years, OMFL compounded at +16.78% per year against +22.93% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.75% and +13.91% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +14.20% annualized vs +13.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 16.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OMFL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OMFL charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFL currently yields 0.79% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.3% of OMFL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 92.6% of VOO's money is in holdings OMFL also owns.
Most of OMFL is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, OMFL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
397 positions in common, counted across the 633 positions we hold weights for in OMFL and 494 in VOO, against full books of 1,272 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 93 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for OMFL (6.8% of the fund), and 214 for OMFL that do not appear in VOO (5.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OMFL | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.04% | 7.05% | 1.99% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.22% | 7.55% | 2.33% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.37% | 5.36% | 1.01% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 2.96% | 3.24% | 0.28% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 1.94% | 4.13% | 2.19% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.40% | 2.62% | 0.22% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.96% | 0.93% | 2.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.84% | 2.86% | 2.02% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.87% | 1.41% | 0.46% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.26% | 1.90% | 0.64% |
94.3% of OMFL is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OMFL or VOO?
OMFL has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OMFL or VOO?
Over the past year OMFL returned +20.03% vs +18.67% for VOO, so OMFL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFL annualized +13.94% vs +14.20% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OMFL or VOO?
OMFL has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 16.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: OMFL -33.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both OMFL and VOO?
OMFL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OMFL and VOO?
94.3% of OMFL's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 92.6% of VOO's is in holdings OMFL also owns. They hold 397 positions in common, counted across the 633 positions we hold weights for in OMFL and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, OMFL or VOO?
OMFL yields 0.79% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than OMFL?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. OMFL led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. OMFL is less concentrated, with 36.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.